Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Technorati button
Reddit button
Myspace button
Linkedin button
Webonews button
Delicious button
Digg button
Flickr button
Stumbleupon button
Newsvine button
Youtube button

by Harvey

Rapid eLearning Development – Converting PowerPoint into eLearning

December 19, 2011 in Communities, Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 by Harvey

Our goal in design and delivery of training and education is to efficiently and effectively move the knowledge from experienced subject matter experts (SMEs) to people who need that knowledge to perform their jobs. eLearning is one good approach to achieve this goal.

eLearning can be produced at many different interactivity, engagement, multimedia and pedagogical levels. However, in practical terms, eLearning designers are constantly challenged with cost and time constraints in producing high quality eLearning content.

Consider a scenario where:

  • knowledge and associated content is constantly changing,
  • the audience receiving that content is not very large (at least multiple thousands) and/or
  • the budget to produce that content is limited.

For example, in sales training programs, content changes frequently and new content is frequently introduced when new product features and product promotions are introduced to increase sales.

In such scenarios, we need to look for ways to create and update eLearning rapidly without expending a huge amount of time and money.   One of these ways is to convert the existing PowerPoint presentations into eLearning. In other words:

Leverage the in-house experts to create the eLearning content.

Most of our experts and trainers are comfortable with MS Office and many of them have already been using PowerPoint to develop and present content in classroom settings.

In fact, a lot has been written about PowerPoint based eLearning – some training experts and instructional designers have called it ‘page-turner’ eLearning.  However, an eLearning course created through conversion of PowerPoint may be enhanced considerably go beyond a slide show.

Depending on the time, budget and audience size, you have two options for converting PowerPoint to eLearning.

Option A (Simple Conversion):

Simple Conversion

Take your existing PowerPoint presentations from your classroom presentation and convert them into Flash for web presentation.

The conversion of PowerPoint presentation to an eLearning course is extremely rapid and quite inexpensive. Services of an instructional designer are not used for creating such a course. The only input is the PowerPoint presentation and possibly audio narration files.

The web-based content generated from this simple and direct conversion may be enhanced by simple features including:

  1. Basic navigation through a simple Table of Contents  and Previous, Next, Exit buttons or links
  2. Usage of templates including company logo and brand colors, etc.
  3. Audio narration for each slide; the SMEs can record audio the way they would present the content in the classroom
  4. Test questions made available at the end of the presentation or after every major topic

Tools like Instancy can be used to put together the content and the aforementioned enhancements.

To see a sample course created through simple conversion of a PowerPoint presentation to Flash, click here.

This type of conversion of content focuses on transfer of the SME’s knowledge to the audience, that is, it gets the job done.  However, it doesn’t really focus on:

  • Motivating and engaging the audience
  • Providing interactions and strategies for more effective learning

If you have the time and the budget to created eLearning content while still leveraging your existing PowerPoint slides/files, you should consider option B.

Option B (Conversion with Enhancements based on Instructional Design Principles):

Conversion with Enhancements based on Instructional Design Principles

Conversion with Enhancements based on Instructional Design Principles

This option can be considered in a scenario where you don’t want a simple page turner, and your timelines and training budgets allow you to hire an instructional designer and a graphics/media person.

In this type of conversion, you can engage the help of an experienced Instructional Designer to extract the text and graphics from the PowerPoint and re-author it using instructional design strategies. You can leverage all the features of an option A course described above, but you can further enhance the output by including an instructional design process:

  1. Defining learning objectives and outcomes and mapping the content to match those learning objectives and presenting the learning objectives to the learner at the beginning of each topic
  2. Breaking down the content into smaller lessons or topics
  3. Converting static or bulleted text into attractive pages with graphics, video clips or other media elements or interactions (including simple simulations) that engage the users
  4. Making the text content succinct and brief
  5. Creating a test or quiz at the end each lesson or end of the course; question types may range from multiple choice to fill-in-the-blank, drag and drop exercises etc.

You can use eLearning authoring tools and templates to convert eLearning content without investing in custom programming.  This will ensure that your course can be developed fast and the costs can be optimized.

To see a sample course created through option B, click here.

While converting PowerPoint to eLearning is simple and cost effective in many cases, it is not a universal solution for all eLearning and knowledge transfer scenarios and business needs.

Converting PowerPoint to eLearning (following either Option A or B as outlined in this article) does make good sense as a starting point where:

  • existing content is already available in PowerPoint presentations,
  • the SMEs are comfortable working with PowerPoint and
  • budget and time are limited.

by Harvey

Profiting from Blended eLearning

December 19, 2011 in Blended Learning, Communities, Rapid eLearning Development, Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 by Harvey

The original use of the phrase “blended learning” was often associated with simply linking traditional classroom training to elearning activities, such as asynchronous work (typically accessed by learners outside the class at their own time and pace). However, the term has evolved to encompass a much richer set of learning strategies, technologies and choices.

Blended learning these days combines structured classroom learning with informal modes of learning that use mobile delivery options, virtual classrooms or labs, social networking tools, enabling students to participate in discussions, share videos, post comments and ideas,  and a whole lot more.

From a learning perspective:

  • Stronger learning outcomes: Blended learning provides a more engaging learning experience, and hence a stronger learning outcome for the student.
  • More effective learning: Learning occurs over a relatively longer time span, rather than being limited to a learning event. Individuals’ media preferences tend to vary, but combining multiple modes of instructions in a course addresses multiple learning styles.   Therefore, retention rates in blended learning programs are higher since the learners have a greater possibility to applying what they’re learning on the job and sharing their experiences with others.
  • Higher completion rates: Compared to an all elearning course, blended learning courses show higher completion rates. Students have higher likelihood of finishing a course which encompasses all aspects of a learning experience including content, discussions, assignments and evaluation mechanism and greater sense of accountability.

From a business perspective:

  • Higher perceived value: The audience attach a higher perceived value to blended learning courses because of opportunities to interact with experts. This means that they are willing to pay more for such programs.
  • Optimized Development Cost and Time: A totally online, self-paced, media-rich, Web-based training content may be too expensive to produce in all instances (requiring multiple resources and skills), but combining virtual collaborative and coaching sessions with simpler self-paced materials can optimize development time as well as effort, and create programs that are just as effective, if not more. New, fresh content can be added over time to keep students up to date with the information. Therefore, blended learning programs provide more economical scalability in distributing the training programs.
  • Higher revenue potential through membership revenue: As these blended learning courses are usually of relatively longer duration, there is potential for subscription based revenue model.  Membership based on monthly subscription can provide recurring revenue streams for training providers.
  • Increased reach/accessibility: Traditional classroom sessions require working professionals to be away from work for 2-3 days or longer at a time, which may not always work from the business perspective. In contrast, think of virtual classroom events such as webinars, which are inclusive of remote audiences. When followed up with recorded knowledge objects (ability to playback a recorded live event) and social collaboration, can extend the reach to those who could not attend at a specific time.
Let’s take the example of a 6 month course on Financial Analysis. Using the blended learning format, the basics can be covered using elearning modules, while regular webinars can provide students opportunities to interact with, and learn from experts.

Social networking tools as well as mobile tools can be used to extend reach and encourage collaborative learning. Discussion boards enable students to share ideas, videos, post comments. Assessment modules enable them to test their learning.

The revenue model can be based on a membership program with a recurring revenue stream, where members pay subscriptions every month to attend new webinars and gain access to fresh articles or training modules. Thus, the revenue potential is fairly high.

It is time to give blended a serious look:  to a model of learning which is flexible, which uses formal as well as informal tools of learning, and provides benefits of self paced as well as collaborative learning at lower costs and higher revenue possibilities.

by Harvey

Learning 2.0 – Moving Learning to the Next Level

March 23, 2009 in Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 by Harvey

Leveraging Web 2.0 Concepts, Learning 2.0 enables rapid knowledgecreation and sharing. Learning 2.0 expands learning into a continuous
learning process that reaches far beyond the confines of a classroom.

Share your insights on:

  • How to apply Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 concepts to enterprise andeveryday learning
  • Compare first generation learning management and learning contentmanagement systems with next    generation learning models
  • Design social-networking and community learning environments

by Harvey

Using Social Networking within Online Learning Program Options

March 23, 2009 in Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 by Harvey

Peer-to-peer communication needs to be encouraged within online
learning courses. I’d like to learn more about examples where folks
are beginning to link eLearning courses with social networks. One
example would be include or link discussion boards with eLearning
courses.

by Harvey

Learning 2.0 – Moving Learning to the Next Level

March 23, 2009 in Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 by Harvey

 Leveraging Web 2.0 Concepts, Learning 2.0 enables rapid knowledge creation and sharing. Learning 2.0 expands learning into a continuous learning process that reaches far beyond the confines of a classroom

Share your insights on:

  • How to apply Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 concepts to enterprise and everyday learning 
  • Compare first generation learning management and learning content management systems with next generation learning models 
  • Design social-networking and community learning environments

by Harvey

Creating Mash-ups for Learning Options

March 23, 2009 in Web 2.0 and Learning 2.0 by Harvey

Mash-up is a combination of data and elements from two or more web
based applications. For example, an student course completion data in
an Learning Management System application may be combined with sales
person’s closure rate in a CRM (Customer Relationship Management
system). Would like to learn more about how others are creating mash-
ups within online Learning.

by Harvey

Marketing and Profiting

March 23, 2009 in Marketing and Profiting by Harvey

This community is for learning professionals that want to discuss Instructional Design strategies and perhaps how to take a new approach in this area.

by Harvey

Virtual Classroom

March 23, 2009 in Virtual Classroom by Harvey

This community is for learning professionals that want to discuss Instructional Design strategies and perhaps how to take a new approach in this area.

by Harvey

Blended Learning

March 23, 2009 in Blended Learning by Harvey

This community is for learning professionals that want to discuss Instructional Design strategies and perhaps how to take a new approach in this area.

by Harvey

Mobile Learning

March 23, 2009 in Mobile Learning by Harvey

This community is for learning professionals that want to discuss Instructional Design strategies and perhaps how to take a new approach in this area.